During the last decade, many companies have invested heavily in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems. Most of these organizations benefited from this new IT innovation. Other challenges and valuable lessons learned during the implementation of ERP projects. Today, the Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs & 39; s) are realising the potential benefits of ERP to an organization, and consider investing in ERP solution. Hence, understanding ERP and what it offers today, in the business world is crucial to its supplier of software and selection. This article provides an overview of the ERP and describes its basic operations. Then, the document analyzes world in Enterprise Resource Planning, and a list of the main factors critical to the success of ERP implementation.
The emergence of the Internet, evolving customer needs, the pressure to accelerate the business process and the need to create more collaborative relationships with key suppliers and trading partners are pushing for all organizations ERP solution. So what is ERP? Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) is described as a " information system package that integrates information and information based processes within and across functional areas of an organization " [1]. Traditional stand-alone applications are designed for specific customers, with limited functionality, and isolated from other applications. Rather, ERP is a business tool that integrates all applications required by an organization as a whole, and connects the organization of other companies in the form of a network. It is usually compromised by several modules, for example: a financial module, a module of production or distribution of a module. Today, ERP Tuesday added new functions such as supply chain management, data management products, electronic commerce and warehouse management. Thus, ERP opens a window of opportunity for companies to compete globally, respond to competitive pressures, and increase revenue.
ERP & Operations basic characteristics:
ERP facilitates company-wide integrated information system covers all functional areas such as manufacturing, distribution and venda of creditors, Receb veis, inventory, accounting, human resources, etc. Purchasing - core business ERP carry on customer service and increasing satisfaction. -- ERP facilitates the flow of information between different sections or departments of the organization. -- ERP bridges the gap between trading partners that allows collaboration underway. -- ERP is a good solution for better management of projects. -- ERP is built and open system architecture, that is, it enables automatic introduction of the newest technologies, such as: Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT), Electronic Data Interchange (EDI), Internet, Intranet, video conferencing, E-Commerce etc. - ERP not only addresses the demands of society, but also provides the opportunity to improve and continuously improve business processes. -- ERP provides business intelligence tools such as Decision Support System (DSS), Executive Information System (EIS), Reporting, Data Mining and Early Warning Systems (robots) to help people make better decisions and thereby improve their business processes. -- ERP tracks from a wide range of events in an organization, and plans for future activities based on these events.
ERP driving forces:
1. The need to increase the supply chain efficiency.
2. The need to increase access for customers to products or services.
3. The need to reduce operating costs.
4. The need to respond more quickly and flexibly to developments in the marketplace place.
Global ERP Implementation:
Historically, most international companies have managed their systems with regional basis, because there was no one single solution that was generally acceptable. In the dynamic business environment these days there is a strong need for organizations to become competitive globally. The key to success lies in customer satisfaction, by understanding customer needs and offering quality goods and services in the shortest time possible. To support a global perspective, many companies have implemented or are in the process of implementing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems to improve the level of coordination between national authorities of the same company, and also with business partners. However, to achieve this level of coordination is important to have a global market strategy, a computing infrastructure ventures, and business processes in place.
An analysis of recent global ERP projects, highlight the importance of aligning the organization with structure business process and business strategy with IT strategy in order to compete in the international market. " Threads " is a good example of an international company which replaced its legacy with the ERP system. " Threads " had a national organization that operates in the country by country basis.
To structure obtain an overview " Threads " decided that its time to change the transformation of society from a place for a geographical perspective world. Thus, making Europe a market for their commercial operations, and also ensure competitiveness through a focus on quality, price and customer service. The organizational structure and support for global ERP is shown in [2].
Enabling Technologies: Traditional ERP systems required sophisticated and expensive, such as IT infrastructure, mainframe computers. Today, with the advancement of information technology and lower costs of computers, it is possible for SMEs & 39; sa think of ERP systems. Moreover, the power of the Three Tier Client Server and scalable architecture based relational database management become easier to deploy ERP systems in various places. Implementation of ERP:
Implementing an ERP project is a process was in many phases. Following a step-by-step approach will simplify the process and is more likely to produce a better result. The usual steps involved in implementing an ERP are: the Project Operational Planning the Business and analysis, including the Gap Analysis Business Process Reengineering the Project Installation and setup time of the formation of the Business Requirement mapping module setup, the system interfaces Custom data conversion of the Documentation the end-user training the acceptance test the implementation Post / Audit support
In short, ERP implementation can transform the way an organization conducts business. It helps the company to link its resources, use and allocate them the best and control them in real time. For example, in the case of & 39; Threads " the transformation of the system of Legacy ERP system resulted in a reduction of data redundancy, reducing overhead costs, increased customer responsiveness and levels of customer service throughout the company. This has been facilitated by the implementation of a common global ERP system throughout its European operation.
Critical factors of success of ERP:
The successful implementation of an ERP draft management plan requires careful, and have all necessary human and financial resources on the spot. Below is a list of the main factors critical to the success of ERP:
1-Top Management Support: Among the most important factors for the success of the project ERP is the top management commitment and support. The role of top management, includes developing an understanding of the capabilities and limitations of the proposed system, setting goals, and communicate the corporate IT strategy for all employees [3].
2-Project Management: Another important factor in the success of ERP is managing the project life-cycle to initiate the closing phase. The Project Manager (PM) has sole responsibility and authority to plan and manage the project scope to meet the benefits specified time frame and in budget.
3-Selection of the appropriate package: Selecting the right package is an important managerial decision. Analysis and evaluation of needs and processes of organization help in making the right choice that best fits the business environment. A careful selection of the right package results in minimal change and successful implementation and use. About hand, selecting the wrong software can mean a commitment to architecture and application that does not fit with the strategic objective organizational or business process [3].
4-User training and education: The quality of enforcement may derailed by poorly trained employees who do not know how to properly operate the system for ERP. The transfer of knowledge to the employees is without doubt more important than the quality of the system. Therefore, companies should use consultants to run training sessions on how the system works, and how they relate to the business process.
5-Business Process Re-engineering: Business Process Reengineering is a prerequisite for implementation moves forward with ERP system. A study in depth BPR has to be done before taking up ERP. Business Process Reengineering brings the shortcomings of the current system and attempts to maximize productivity through restructuring and re-organize human resources and the departments and divisions organisation
6-Dedicated Resources: A key critical factors of success is the determination of ERP human and financial resources needed to implement the system. This should be done at an early stage of the project. Failing to commit the necessary resources and often result in programming cost overdue.
7 Project Team-Jurisdiction: Another key element of ERP success or failure is related to the knowledge, skills, capabilities and experience of project manager and members of staff. The project team should work in a coordinated way to achieve a goal. Hence, it is vital to team members technical and business skills to take to supplement their work.
8-goals and objectives clear: Set clear objectives and identify the goals of the Project ERP is the third most critical success factor. The initial phase of any project must begin with a conceptualization of the goals and possible ways to achieve these objectives. It is important to define the objectives of the project even before seeking support from upper management [3].
9-Ongoing Support Vendor: ongoing vendor support represents an important factor in any package of software. ERP systems require ongoing vendor support to keep them up to date with the latest version and modules. Beyond this, vendor support provides technical assistance and maintenance.
10 inter-communication: Good communication is a key component to the success of ERP. Hence, is essential for effective communication among team members and the rest of the organization in order to keep everything working properly.
To conclusion, ERP implementation could become a complex and risky, if not managed properly. Organizations need to identify the critical issues affecting the implementation process. Such as: select the software package appropriate, ensuring commitment and support of top management, cooperation from business partners, having adequate knowledge among the team members, train staff and keep them informed. All these questions and more can minimize the failure of the ERP project and maximize the success of ERP implementation.
References:
[1] Kumar, K. and Van Hillegersberg, J. Trials and developments PRTs, Communications of ACM, (43: 4), pp. 23 to 26, 2000.
[2] C. Holland and Light B. (1999) Global Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation Retrieved August, 27, from 2005: http://csdl2.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/1999 / 0001/07/00017016.PDF
[3] TM Somers, and Nelson K. (2001), the impact of Critical Success Factors throughout the stages of Enterprise Resource Planning implementations, published in Hawaii the 34th International Conference on System Sciences, 2001, Hawaii
[4] Holland CP, and Luz B. (1999), The Critical success factor model of ERP implementation, IEEE Software, May / June 1999, pp. 30-36
[5] M. Hammer and Champy J. (1994) Reengineering the Corporation, New York, Harper Business.
[6] M. Kerchevak (2005) Five Steps to an ERP solution, Retrieved September 3, 2005 from: http://archives.tcm.ie/businesspost/2005/06/05/story5254.asp
[7] S. Robinson (2004) An Overview of the developer of ERP, Retrieved September 1, 2005 from: http://www.developer .com/design/article.php/3446551
Bookmark it:
Saturday, May 3, 2008
Wednesday, April 23, 2008
Are Your Company Documents at Risk?
Most companies have thousands of products and documents among employees each year. Although it & 39; May, policies to prevent the escape of important documents to & 39; outside the office, many of these measures is difficult to implement, time and other & 39 ; Constraints. Hence the large companies numerous documents that are not stored in the form of installations on jobs, and on a removable media devices.
Enforcing for keeping documents and the political management of risks requires employees to pursue manually or unnecessary old documents on their computer and the facilities. Manual cataloguing and the abolition of these documents can be many hours, but the companies can improve & 39; pain of the loss of data and not data.
However, instead of hours, to classify and to delete these documents as a Project secondary, it would be much easier, the management of documents, while you work. As a solution, there is a danger that the management software allows employees, the documents opened and on jobs, by e-mail and secure networks. This allows the employees quickly on the document, what with changes on this issue. C & 39, is ideal for the documentation concerning the projects, and how you an easy way to secure documents without interference in the work of employees. This software is an effective means to the employees at work, and a secure way to the storage of company documents.
Bookmark it:
Enforcing for keeping documents and the political management of risks requires employees to pursue manually or unnecessary old documents on their computer and the facilities. Manual cataloguing and the abolition of these documents can be many hours, but the companies can improve & 39; pain of the loss of data and not data.
However, instead of hours, to classify and to delete these documents as a Project secondary, it would be much easier, the management of documents, while you work. As a solution, there is a danger that the management software allows employees, the documents opened and on jobs, by e-mail and secure networks. This allows the employees quickly on the document, what with changes on this issue. C & 39, is ideal for the documentation concerning the projects, and how you an easy way to secure documents without interference in the work of employees. This software is an effective means to the employees at work, and a secure way to the storage of company documents.
Bookmark it:
Free Java Script Tutorial
This tutorial will take you bit by bit through the fundamentals of JavaScript. You will learn how to write functions, use data from text boxes, create conditionals function loops, and generally make your web page "Java tutorial classes for a living to commercial clients of all levels. I have well-read a lot about communication between people of various levels of computer experience. This tutorial assumes that you have no preceding programming experience, but that you have created your own HTML pages. If you find this tutorial helpful, please let me know. Also, links are courteously accepted. JavaScript is easy-to-use programming languages that can be implant in the heading of your web pages. It can augment the dynamics and interactive features of your page by allowing you to perform calculations, check forms, write interactive games, add special effects, customize graphics selections, and create security passwords and more.
What s the difference between JavaScript and Java?
Actually, the 2 languages have almost nothing in common except for the name. Although Java is technically an interpreted programming language, it is coded in a similar fashion to C++, with separate header and class files, compiled together preceding to execution. It is powerful enough to write major applications and insert them in a web page as a special object called an "applet." Java has been generating a lot of exhilaration. Java is not considered an easy-to-use language for non-programmers.
JavaScript is much simpler to use than Java. With JavaScripts, if I want check a form for errors; I just type an if-then statement at the top of my page. No compiling, no applets, just a simple sequence.
This is write Karl Garcia will be dealing with ZIP Codes as they were defined for the purpose of tabulate the 1990 survey Free Scripts summary.
Bookmark it:
What s the difference between JavaScript and Java?
Actually, the 2 languages have almost nothing in common except for the name. Although Java is technically an interpreted programming language, it is coded in a similar fashion to C++, with separate header and class files, compiled together preceding to execution. It is powerful enough to write major applications and insert them in a web page as a special object called an "applet." Java has been generating a lot of exhilaration. Java is not considered an easy-to-use language for non-programmers.
JavaScript is much simpler to use than Java. With JavaScripts, if I want check a form for errors; I just type an if-then statement at the top of my page. No compiling, no applets, just a simple sequence.
This is write Karl Garcia will be dealing with ZIP Codes as they were defined for the purpose of tabulate the 1990 survey Free Scripts summary.
Bookmark it:
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
Disruptive Technologies - Part 3: the Music Editor and the Voice Changer
Staunch critics of this defining evolution of technologies might still find neither Napster nor the VoIP epitomic of disruptive technologies after reading my Part 2 on Disruptive Technologies. That is logical, as what Napster replaced is truly debatable, and the VoIP technologies have yet to take over traditional telephony.
Perhaps I should delve deeper into the Napster impact and the upcoming VoIP challenge to further prove my point, that they are indeed disruptive technologies.
Peer-2-Peer is not too new (except the term itself): the first P2P applications, USENET and FidoNet, had already been developed in the 1980s. However, Napster was the first popular P2P music sharing program. Its 1999 debut launch was so welcomed, mostly by college students and amateur artistes, that the commercial music industry was sent reeling. Let us not further discuss the questions of legality, privacy and copyrights that almost invariantly engulf the topic of Napster but, instead, what was disrupted.
Napster essentially embodies the revolutionizing file-swapping P2P technology that has since been evolving, with the like of KaZaa, LimeWire or eMule. It is said to have heralded a new age of digital bits (not only music but everything electronically encrypted) circulation on the Net, from the central server method to a peer network of individual computers all across the globe. Indeed, as powerful networked computers and inexpensive bandwidth become available, peer-to-peer computing is transforming the way information is exchanged, stored and valued. It is winning the battle against subscription services (a move by computer giants to take on P2P technology). Too bad for the latter that P2P is cheap, or even free, and by far tough to beat.
With P2P comes sheer creativity that sustains the force: the music editor software industry. It is fair to say that music editors are somewhat underappreciated in the rise of P2P networks. Allow me to re-emphasize the point that the majority of Napster fans were college students and amateur artistes. Both make convenient use of music editor softwares developed by Audio4Fun, Sony or Adobe to facilitate their P2P experience: the former could avoid copyrights violation, while the latter perfect their works before publishing. Yet, despite considerable contribution to the growth of Napster, music editors are not anywhere near the discussion of P2P technologies. Though modern file-sharing arrangements allow transfers of original copies and all other types of electronic documents, music editors and the like together with broadband connection have helped effect a shift from the central-server file transfers to peer-oriented file sharing.
P2P not only impacts the music entertainment; the movie and publishing industries are next in queue to worry. However, the biggest web buzz these days is Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP). Israeli Vocaltec offered the first Internet Phone product 11 years ago. Now, Skype, Vonage and Google Talk are ferociously promoting the business.
Voice data packets empower communication efficiency, as bandwidth lines are not entirely used up by ongoing conversations. Reserved bandwidth and improved sound quality are making VoIP an effective alternative to traditional telephony: connection lines are constantly being wired all over the world, and voice changer software products promise to bring customers clearer nick-voices of their own preference. Standard telephone networks, especially mass-market long-distance services, are already feeling the heat of the competition, as many VoIP companies are offering unlimited calls to anywhere in the world for a very affordable monthly subscription fee.
However, placing phone calls alone does not justify a global switch-over to VoIP. The technology needs to promote a more diverse utility. Fortunately, VoIP can do just that; it boasts more potential than just the cost advantage over traditional telephony. Corporate use of VoIP is increasing, with IBM and General Motors applying VoIP networks to facilitate their discussions. The US Navy also uses Tenor VoIP for secure ship-to-shore communications. In addition, one other important potential of VoIP is said to be site interconnection: university campuses could be interconnected at little costs for effective exchange of workshop materials and students project works.
Despite many theses, VoIP has not achieved major market share compared to the long-standing PSTNs (Public Switched Telephone Networks). But it could in the near future. In view of the many potential uses of VoIP, that does not seem a wild bet. A spokesperson from Verizon would agree with me, as he gleefully called VoIP a disruptive technology and touted it as a selling point for DSL lines.
Yes, VoIP and Napster-inspired P2P technology face challenges of their own on their way to successfully displace market giants. VoIP needs to develop the omnipresent effect to make it the equivalent of mobile phones, while P2P networks has yet to address the standard of exchange sources. Furthermore, both are concerned with the issues of security and quality of service. Music editors and voice changers could only mitigate parts, and not all, of these problems. And as soon as there is a significant viral outbreak, VoIP and P2P will go down.
Nevertheless, as long as P2P remains online, and free, it may be difficult for Universal or Sony BMG to find new customers. And VoIP holds the prospect of cheap communication for an increasingly connected world. A few addressable problems cannot blur men s vision from these billions-of-dollars ventures that only new, disruptive technologies could entail.
About the Author:
Josh Nowell is a Media Morpher writer who specializes in technology research. This article is the third in the 4-part series on Disruptive Technologies of his. Contact him at media@audio4fun.com.
Bookmark it:
Perhaps I should delve deeper into the Napster impact and the upcoming VoIP challenge to further prove my point, that they are indeed disruptive technologies.
Peer-2-Peer is not too new (except the term itself): the first P2P applications, USENET and FidoNet, had already been developed in the 1980s. However, Napster was the first popular P2P music sharing program. Its 1999 debut launch was so welcomed, mostly by college students and amateur artistes, that the commercial music industry was sent reeling. Let us not further discuss the questions of legality, privacy and copyrights that almost invariantly engulf the topic of Napster but, instead, what was disrupted.
Napster essentially embodies the revolutionizing file-swapping P2P technology that has since been evolving, with the like of KaZaa, LimeWire or eMule. It is said to have heralded a new age of digital bits (not only music but everything electronically encrypted) circulation on the Net, from the central server method to a peer network of individual computers all across the globe. Indeed, as powerful networked computers and inexpensive bandwidth become available, peer-to-peer computing is transforming the way information is exchanged, stored and valued. It is winning the battle against subscription services (a move by computer giants to take on P2P technology). Too bad for the latter that P2P is cheap, or even free, and by far tough to beat.
With P2P comes sheer creativity that sustains the force: the music editor software industry. It is fair to say that music editors are somewhat underappreciated in the rise of P2P networks. Allow me to re-emphasize the point that the majority of Napster fans were college students and amateur artistes. Both make convenient use of music editor softwares developed by Audio4Fun, Sony or Adobe to facilitate their P2P experience: the former could avoid copyrights violation, while the latter perfect their works before publishing. Yet, despite considerable contribution to the growth of Napster, music editors are not anywhere near the discussion of P2P technologies. Though modern file-sharing arrangements allow transfers of original copies and all other types of electronic documents, music editors and the like together with broadband connection have helped effect a shift from the central-server file transfers to peer-oriented file sharing.
P2P not only impacts the music entertainment; the movie and publishing industries are next in queue to worry. However, the biggest web buzz these days is Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP). Israeli Vocaltec offered the first Internet Phone product 11 years ago. Now, Skype, Vonage and Google Talk are ferociously promoting the business.
Voice data packets empower communication efficiency, as bandwidth lines are not entirely used up by ongoing conversations. Reserved bandwidth and improved sound quality are making VoIP an effective alternative to traditional telephony: connection lines are constantly being wired all over the world, and voice changer software products promise to bring customers clearer nick-voices of their own preference. Standard telephone networks, especially mass-market long-distance services, are already feeling the heat of the competition, as many VoIP companies are offering unlimited calls to anywhere in the world for a very affordable monthly subscription fee.
However, placing phone calls alone does not justify a global switch-over to VoIP. The technology needs to promote a more diverse utility. Fortunately, VoIP can do just that; it boasts more potential than just the cost advantage over traditional telephony. Corporate use of VoIP is increasing, with IBM and General Motors applying VoIP networks to facilitate their discussions. The US Navy also uses Tenor VoIP for secure ship-to-shore communications. In addition, one other important potential of VoIP is said to be site interconnection: university campuses could be interconnected at little costs for effective exchange of workshop materials and students project works.
Despite many theses, VoIP has not achieved major market share compared to the long-standing PSTNs (Public Switched Telephone Networks). But it could in the near future. In view of the many potential uses of VoIP, that does not seem a wild bet. A spokesperson from Verizon would agree with me, as he gleefully called VoIP a disruptive technology and touted it as a selling point for DSL lines.
Yes, VoIP and Napster-inspired P2P technology face challenges of their own on their way to successfully displace market giants. VoIP needs to develop the omnipresent effect to make it the equivalent of mobile phones, while P2P networks has yet to address the standard of exchange sources. Furthermore, both are concerned with the issues of security and quality of service. Music editors and voice changers could only mitigate parts, and not all, of these problems. And as soon as there is a significant viral outbreak, VoIP and P2P will go down.
Nevertheless, as long as P2P remains online, and free, it may be difficult for Universal or Sony BMG to find new customers. And VoIP holds the prospect of cheap communication for an increasingly connected world. A few addressable problems cannot blur men s vision from these billions-of-dollars ventures that only new, disruptive technologies could entail.
About the Author:
Josh Nowell is a Media Morpher writer who specializes in technology research. This article is the third in the 4-part series on Disruptive Technologies of his. Contact him at media@audio4fun.com.
Bookmark it:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)